Legal Opinion
In Re Harper's Estate
Montana Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1950No. 8939PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
218 P.2d 927 (1950)
In re HARPER'S ESTATE.
STATE
v.
BOWMAN.
No. 8939.
Supreme Court of Montana.
Submitted April 12, 1950.
Decided May 25, 1950.
H. O. Vralstad, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Arnold H. Olsen, Atty. Gen., H. D. Carmichael, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Murphy, Garlington & Pauly, Missoula, and Mr. Edmund T. Fritz, Missoula, for respondent.
METCALF, Justice.
The decedent, Catherine Harper, was the insured under three endowment insurance contracts, all of which matured during her lifetime. All three contracts are alike in so far as the question here presented is concerned. One of the policies…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blum v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- In Re Fligman's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1942
- Blum v. HigginsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- State v. BowmanMontana Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Hammerstrom's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Estate of Kasishke v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Inheritance Tax on Matured Endowment Policies, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1963
- State v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. HammerstromMontana Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.