State v. Bowman
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE METCALF:
The decedent, Catherine Harper, was the insured under three endowment insurance contracts, all of which matured during her lifetime. All three contracts are alike in so far as the question here presented is concerned. One of the policies which will be used as an example matured as an endowment -policy on August 30, 1944. Mrs. Harper became entitled to the face value of $10,000 plus $811 accrued dividends. Under the terms of her policy she could be paid in one lump sum or she could exercise any one of four designated optional modes of settlement. She chose to exercise…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Fligman's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1942
- Blum v. HigginsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Harper's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re Hammerstrom's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Estate of Kasishke v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Inheritance Tax on Matured Endowment Policies, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1963
- State v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.