Legal Opinion

Doll v. Thornhill

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1942No. 17572PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit by a real estate agent for a commission alleged to be due him as the result of the sale of property by defendant. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant has appealed.

On May 3, 1940, defendant Wm. E. Thornhill, entered into a written contract with plaintiff, Doll, under which he employed the said Doll as exclusive agent for the sale of the property known as No. 8015 Orpheus Court in New Orleans. The contract, among other stipulations, contained the following:

"I employ you or your successors, exclusively, to sell same for $3700.00 * * * or for any other price, or terms…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Neal v. Southland Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  2. Alex F. Dreyfus Co. v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  3. Clesi v. CooneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. E & E Mining, Inc. v. Flying "D" Group, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kislak Co., Inc. v. GeldzahlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  3. Donlon v. BabinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Acadian Investment Co. v. LairdLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. International Network, Inc. v. WoodardColorado Court of Appeals · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API