Legal Opinion

Thames v. Dennison

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 15, 1992No. 3-90-274-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, Chief Justice.

This is a malpractice suit involving an alleged negligent surgical operation. Defendants moved for summary judgment on the basis that the claim is barred by a two-year statute of limitations. See Tex.Rev. Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 4590i, § 10.01 (Supp. 1991). The trial court rendered a take-nothing summary judgment, and Thames now appeals. We will affirm the trial court judgment.

BACKGROUND

Melvin Thames, joined by his wife, brought a medical malpractice suit against Dr. Robert Dennison, Medical Park Ortho-paedic Clinic, and Seton Hospital, because of Dr. Dennison’s alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Delgado v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Borderlon v. PeckTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Nichols v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Kimball v. BrothersTexas Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Marchal v. Webb, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  2. Li v. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Santanna Natural Gas Corp. and Women's Natural Gas Corp. v. Hamon Operating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  4. Rotella v. PedersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. Patrick v. Howard, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API