Honey v. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa
At La,w. Action to recover damages resulting to plaintiff from personal injuries caused to wife of plaintiff. Motion for new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
SIMBAS, District Judge.
Upon the trial of this case before the jury the facts developed in the evidence were as follows: In the year 1891 the plaintiff, W. O. B. Honey, and his wife, Ellen F., resided on a farm in the vicinity of the town of Bed Oak, Iowa, which-is a station upon the line of railway owned and operated by the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company. On the 15th day of August in that year the plaintiff and wife went to Red Oak for the purpose of taking a train upon the defendant’s railway. In order to secure tickets; the plaintiff preceded his wife to the depot. To reach…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Nesbit v. Town of GarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. LapsleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
- Mewhirter v. HattenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Louisville Ry. Co. v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. HoneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Adams Hotel Co. v. CobbCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1899
- Hickman v. Nassau Electric RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Priester v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929