Legal Opinion

Marriage of Daniel Pamela Smith

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2008No. DA 08-0008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Appellant Daniel Smith (“Smith”) appeals from the judgment of the Tenth Judicial District Court ordering him to pay his ex-spouse Pamela Bristol (“Bristol”) damages and fees resulting from his alleged failure to pay debts pursuant to their Divorce Settlement Agreement entered into in the State of Georgia. Smith contends that the court erred in not granting his motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction over him. We affirm.

¶2 Smith has raised three issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Do Montana courts possess personal jurisdiction of Mr. Smith?

¶4 2. Did Mr. Smith waive his objection to personal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Filip v. JordanMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Heinle v. Fourth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garza v. Forquest Ventures, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API