Legal Opinion
Sewell v. D'Alessandro & Woodyard, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided September 10, 2009No. 6:07-cv-00343PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN E. STEELE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on eight motions to dismiss. In an Opinion and Order (Doc. # 203) filed on September 29, 2008, 2008 WL 4459260, the Court dismissed plaintiffs’ First Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. # 82) for non-compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b), but granted “one final opportunity” for plaintiffs to file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs have now filed their Second Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. # 205), to which all defendants have again filed motions to dismiss (Docs. ##257, 258, 259, 260, 261,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goldberg v. 401 North Wabash Venture LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Sewell v. D'Alessandro & Woodyard, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2010