Legal Opinion

Hammac v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1968No. 1 Div. 299PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

These appellants were indicted separately but the cases were consolidated for trial and on appeal.

The indictments charged the larceny of “one Mercury outboard motor serial number 742497 of the value of $150.00, the personal property of William H. Roberts * * There was no proof of the serial number of the motor.

In a prosecution for larceny the proof must correspond with the description of the identical thing alleged in the indictment to have been taken. The court erred in denying the defendants’ motion to exclude the state’s evidence on the ground that the description of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Love v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FerraraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Crenshaw v. Alabama Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. Rivas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API