Baich v. Campbell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOSS, Presiding Judge.
The primary issue we address is whether a representation that defendants/appellees, Glen Campbell and Darrell Chapman (investors), were partners with produce buyer Joe Ali (buyer) was made in a public manner within the meaning of A.R.S. § 29-216(A), thereby creating a partnership by estoppel. We agree with the trial court that the representation was not made in a public manner, and accordingly, affirm.
FACTS
Plaintiff Boris Baich and investors separately entered into agreements with buyer wherein buyer would purchase produce *198from Mexican farmers to sell to Arizona…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hoffman v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Gilbert v. HowardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Facit-Addo, Inc. v. Davis Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
3Cited by1 opinion
- Duncan v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995