Legal Opinion

Steele v. McCurdy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 26, 1953No. 7 Div. 187PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

Complainant’s bill was filed to define and establish a boundary line over which there was a dispute between the parties, under the provisions of Code 1940, Title 13, section 129, and Title 47, sections 2 et seq Demurrers were filed to the bill, and this appeal results from the overruling of the demurrers.

Paragraph two of the bill describes the property of complainant in meticulous detail and with legal sufficiency. Paragraph three of the bill alleges that the respondent 'owns real property lying adjacent to the property of complainant, and the property of the respondent is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Sellers v. ValenzuelaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Baldwin v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Blalock v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Ford v. BeamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whitehurst v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Wynne v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Steele v. McCurdySupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Watts v. Kyle Realty CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API