Legal Opinion

Brink v. Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 14, 1949No. 40547PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Respondent's brief contains a fair statement of the facts in this case and we adopt it as the statement of the court. It reads as follows:

"This is an action for money had and received, in several counts, prosecuted by Arthur T. Brink as trustee and assignee of various property owners, to recover back monies paid to the city by the assignors on tax bills issued by the city to pay for the construction of the second section of the Brookside sewer in Kansas City. Defendant city has appealed from a judgment for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for including interest from the dates of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. United States Fire Insurance v. TerteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Coleman v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. Coleman v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Coleman v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Brink v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burger v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Springfield Land & Development Co. v. BassMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Schreck v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Brinkmann v. Common School Dist. No. 27Missouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Perkins v. SchickerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API