Johnson v. Union Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentHarvey, J.
I dissent from that portion of the opinion which holds that Cleo Johnson, for whose death this action was brought, was guilty of such contributory negligence as a matter of law that plaintiffs cannot recover. I think the question of his contributory negligence was for the jury.
I think it is well settled in this state that when a traveler upon a street or highway approaches a railroad crossing at which he has reason to believe a flagman will be stationed to give warning of an approaching train, he is entitled to rely upon that fact to some extent; that while the absence of the flagman under…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Scott v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburg Railroad v. HutchinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Jacobs v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Richmond v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Montgomery v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1904
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.