Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Union Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1943No. 35,872Published

1DissentHarvey, J.

I dissent from that portion of the opinion which holds that Cleo Johnson, for whose death this action was brought, was guilty of such contributory negligence as a matter of law that plaintiffs cannot recover. I think the question of his contributory negligence was for the jury.

I think it is well settled in this state that when a traveler upon a street or highway approaches a railroad crossing at which he has reason to believe a flagman will be stationed to give warning of an approaching train, he is entitled to rely upon that fact to some extent; that while the absence of the flagman under…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Scott v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburg Railroad v. HutchinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Jacobs v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Richmond v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Montgomery v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1904

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API