Legal Opinion

B. F. Goodrich Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1943No. 10035PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court in favor of the Government, upon a suit for recovery of additional manufacturer’s excise tax assessed against and paid by appellant’s predecessor in interest, Pacific Goodrich Rubber Company.

The action was tried upon a stipulation of facts and no dispute exists between the parties thereon. The Pacific Goodrich Rubber Company, a Delaware corporation (herein referred to, for convenience, as the “Pacific Company”), was at all times prior to its dissolution the wholly owned subsidiary of appellant, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Tucker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. Garbutt Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carmack v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  2. Scovill Manufacturing Company v. John J. Fitzpatrick, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  3. United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Bob Hindes and Wife, Dorothy Lee Hindes v. United States of America, United States of America v. Bob Hindes and Wife, Dorothy Lee HindesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API