Legal Opinion
Bullard v. Holman
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 16, 1937No. 11949PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Husserl, Chief Justice.
J. C., W. C., Grady, and J. L. Holman, a partnership trading under the name of J. C. & W. C. Holman Mule Company, filed suit in Mitchell superior court against W. W. Bullard on a promissory note and sales agreement executed by "W. W. Bullard and II. T. Bullard. The defendant filed a plea that the plaintiff was a partnership, but that the trade-name thereof had never been registered with the clerk of the superior court of Mitchell County, and that said trade-name had not been registered with the clerk of the superior court of Dougherty Count,y, where the plaintiff's…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Danforth v. Groton Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Pritchard v. Savannah Street & Rural Resort RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Gaston v. MerriamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Bussey v. BishopSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Deal v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Orlicki v. McCarthyIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Ferrero v. Associated Materials Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Goldrush II v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.