Legal Opinion

Lee v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1980No. 79-199Published

1Opinion of the Court

423 A.2d 210 (1980)

Emma LEE, Robert Harlan, and Vanessa Hayes, Petitioners,

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF APPEALS AND REVIEW, Respondent,

BGM Associates, Intervenor.

No. 79-199.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued February 19, 1980.

Decided November 6, 1980.

Paul D. Scott, Neighborhood Legal Services Program, Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

Richard W. Barton, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for respondent.

Philip Musolino argued for intervenor. Joanne Sgro, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for intervenor. J. Jonathan Schraub, Washington, D. C., also…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API