Legal Opinion
Patel v. LIEBERMENSCH
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 21, 2007No. D048582Published
1Opinion of the Court
64 Cal.Rptr.3d 608 (2007)
154 Cal.App.4th 373
Sunil PATEL, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Morris LIEBERMENSCH et al., Defendants and Appellants.
No. D048582.
Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division One.
August 21, 2007.
Law Offices of Lee R. Goldberg and Lee R. Goldberg for Defendants and Appellants.
Mitchell & Gilleon and James C. Mitchell for Plaintiff and Respondent.
HUFFMAN, J.
Plaintiff Sunil Patel (Patel) sued defendants Morris Liebermensch, Zita Liebermensch and the Liebermensch Family Partnership, L.P. (Liebermensch), to allege entitlement to specific performance of an option…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Kuhn v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.