Legal Opinion

Smith-Johnson Steamship Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 12, 1956No. 98-55PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In our opinion in this case rendered March 6, 1956, which was before us at that time on plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s special defense, we granted that motion, holding that plaintiff’s petition was based on a statute and did not arise out of the maritime contract between the United States and plaintiff. Hence, we said the courts of admiralty did not have jurisdiction of such a case and that this court did.

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals had held in Sword Line, Inc. v. United States, 228 F. 2d 844, that the suit was on the contract, and since the contract was for the…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Johnson v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Archawski v. HaniotiSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. United Continental Tuna Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Buck Kreihs Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  3. Martran Steamship Co. v. Aegean Tankers LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  4. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  5. Marine Transport Lines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API