Legal Opinion

Roland Carl Shelvy v. Salanda Whitfield

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 16, 1983No. 82-1921PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:

This case concerns the calculation of credit for presentence time spent in custody. Petitioning for a writ of habeas corpus, Roland Shelvy claimed that he should receive, in addition to the 233 days of credit allowed by the District of Columbia Department of Corrections, a further credit' of approximately six months. The district court denied Shelvy’s application; it held that the statute governing presentence credit, 18 U.S.C. § 3568, does not permit the relief Shelvy seeks.1 We affirm the district court’s judgment. Our holding rests on two interrelated conclusions.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. Juan A. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. George Gordon LiddyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. United States ex rel. Del Genio v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. Percy E. Wilson v. J. D. Henderson, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Larry Joe Carnine, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. State v. BeetsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. GaviganCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  4. State v. BlondinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. In Re Wilton Chatman-BeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API