Legal Opinion

Medlock v. Blackwell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 2000No. 47A01-9906-CV-207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge

Walter and Marion Medloek appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to correct error and motion for a new trial filed after a jury returned a verdict finding them 49% at fault in a collision that occurred while they were passengers in a vehicle stopped at a traffic light. The Medlocks raise the following issue for our review: whether the jury verdict finding that their actions contributed to the collision was entirely against the weight of the evidence and could only have been rendered as the result of corruption, confusion, passion, or prejudice.

We affirm.

FACTS AND…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deible v. PooleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. DeVittorio v. Werker Bros., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Deible v. PooleIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Gregory & Appel Insurance Agency v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Kocher v. GetzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Kocher v. GetzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API