Legal Opinion

Naud v. King Sewing Machine Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Demurrer by the plaintiff to a portion of the defendant’s answer to the plaintiff’s complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The complaint sets forth a cause of action for alleged negligence under the Employers’ Liability Act of this state. It alleges in substance that the defendant negligently failed' to furnish and provide the plaintiff while in its employ ‘ ‘ with reasonably safe implements, appliances, ventilators, fans, blowers or other devices * * * for the carrying away of poisonous and dangerous gases and «fumes; in permitting and allowing poisonous gases and fumes to accumulate and remain in and about the place in which this plaintiff was required to work, * * * and through the carelessness and negligence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Jensen v. . Southern Pacific Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cannella v. Gulf Refining Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. HellerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Di Pietro v. Mayor and City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  4. Gray v. BurdinNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Semmen v. Butterick Publishing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API