Legal Opinion

State v. Torkomian

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 4, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, DiStefano, with two others was convicted of the crime of rape and was given an indeterminate sentence of fifteen to twenty-five years in the State prison. The sole ground of appeal is that this sentence was in violation of some constitutional guaranty. It was within the term of punishment fixed by the statute, which provides a penalty of' imprisonment for not more than thirty years.- General Statutes, § 6240. The appellant does not contend that the statute itself imposes a penalty beyond the power of the legislature to prescribe for this crime, but that the particular sentence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . SwindellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. People v. JagoszMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State v. BecknerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. The People v. MundroIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Collins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  2. State v. ChuchelowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  3. State v. MeleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. State v. LyonsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  5. State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API