Legal Opinion

In re Lowry

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 24, 1938No. 3844PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 9,14, 15, 20, 22, 33 to 41, inclusive, 45, and 46 in appellant’s application for a patent for- an alleged invention relating to improvements in thermionic cathodes.

Claims 9, 20, 33, 34, and 35 are illustrative of the appealed claims. They read:

9. In combination, a filament comprising cobalt-nickel, an ingredient which, renders the cobalt-nickel composition forgeable and a coating of electron-emissive oxide.

20. In combination with an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. WintroathSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aluminum Co. of America v. Thompson Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Linde Air Products Co. v. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1947
  3. Cryns v. MusherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  4. Application of FreyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Aluminum Co. of America v. Thompson Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API