Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 24, 2012No. 95PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

In Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), the Supreme Court established the now well-known two-pronged test for determining whether a criminal defendant received the effective assistance of counsel that *391is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The test laid out in Strickland burdens the defendant with establishing both “that counsel’s performance was deficient” and that counsel’s errors “prejudiced the defense.” Id. at 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052. This general rule has an exception, however. The defendant is excused from proving…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Robert Lynn VaughanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Kulbicki v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. State v. Sanmartin PradoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API