Legal Opinion

State ex inf. Crow v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 3, 1903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Quo Warranto.

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

These cases are all of the same character, being in quo warranto by the Attorney-General to oust defendants of certain franchises charged to be unlawfully and without authority exercised by' them. They will therefore be considered together. The questions involved are substantially the same, as in State of Missouri ex informations Crow, Attorney-General, v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, decided at the present term, and reported at page 687 of this volume, the only material difference being, in these eases there is no question of interstate transportation involved, while there…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McKittrick v. Missouri Public Service Commission, Laclede Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Sidoti v. Rapid Transit Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Lindsay v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Van Benthuysen v. GenglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Emerson v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API