Legal Opinion

James Coppedge v. Deutsche Bank Natl Trust Co

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 22, 2013No. 12-3066UnpublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

James Coppedge appeals the denial of his request for a preliminary injunction. We will affirm.

In June 2012, Coppedge filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Basing his action on, inter alia, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Coppedge appeared to challenge a mortgage-related proceeding that was currently ongoing in Pennsylvania state court, and raised several arguments associated with the “sovereign citizen” or “redemptionist” movements. 1 For example, he contested a writ of judgment that used his “corporate issue name” (using all upper-case letters, see…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Shawe v. PincusDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017
  2. ACIE-GRIFFIN v. SECRETARY OF THE TREASURYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  3. AWAI v. USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANKDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. BARKSDALE v. NEW AMERICAN FUNDING, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. BATTS v. AMERICAN EXPRESSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API