Legal Opinion

Inwood Post No. 581 v. State Bingo Control Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum by the Court. Determination of respondent, State Bingo Control Commission, confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. Judicial review of its determination is limited to a consideration of whether or not there was substantial evidence to support its essential findings. (See Matter of Stork Rest. v. Boland, 282 N. Y. 256, 273; Matter of Phinn v. Kross, 8 A D 2d 132, 135.) The commission was entitled to rely on circumstantial evidence as the basis for such findings. The commission could draw reasonable inferences from any proven fact and utilize its own…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Claim of Gordon v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mercy Hospital v. New York State Department of Social ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Sunset Taxi Co. v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Mercy Hosp. v. NY SOC SERVSNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API