Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 27, 2002No. A02A0339PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

The state appeals the trial court’s order granting a motion to suppress filed by Lawrence Edward Thompson. We affirm.

In reviewing the grant or denial of a motion to suppress, we construe the evidence most favorably to uphold the findings and judgment of the trial court. Pilkenton v. State, 254 Ga. App. 127 (561 SE2d 462) (2002). “[T]he factual findings of the trial court will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. However, the application of the law to the facts is subject to de novo review.” (Footnotes omitted.) Smith v. State, 245 Ga. App. 613, 615 (538…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Berry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. State v. CauseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. State v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. State v. MaloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API