Legal Opinion

Cleveland v. Hamil

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided March 12, 2013No. 2010-CA-01527-COAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. The motion for rehearing, filed by Dr. Ken E. Cleveland, is denied. We withdraw our original opinion and substitute this modified opinion.

¶ 2. To prove medical malpractice, a plaintiff must present expert testimony on both the standard of care for the particular specialty of the doctor being sued and the doctor’s deviation from that standard of care. The details of this expert testimony must be disclosed before trial to prevent “trial by ambush” with medical theories the defendant doctor is not prepared to meet.

¶ 3. We are faced with a plaintiffs verdict in a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Hubbard v. WansleyMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Barner v. GormanMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. TK Stanley, Inc. v. CasonMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  5. McDonald v. Memorial Hospital at GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beverly Knight v. W. Craig ClarkCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019
  2. Ken E. Cleveland v. Lanell HamilMississippi Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API