Legal Opinion
Sweat v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 11, 1940No. A-9797PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, P. J.
Plaintiff in error was convicted upon an information charging that in Custer county on or about the 7th day of October, 1939, he did then and there commit the offense of forgery in the second degree, in manner and form as follows; to* wit:
“That on or about the date aforesaid, in the County and State aforesaid, the said Odus Sweat did willfully, unlawfully, knowingly, wrongfully, feloniously and falsely, make, write and forge upon a consideration a certain written instrument, to-wit:
“ ‘Arapaho*, Okla. Oct. 7, 1939 No*.
“ ‘Custer County State Bank
“ ‘Pay to* the order of S. J. Sweat $8.85
Eaght…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wingfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Duncan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Pebworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.