Sink v. . Hire
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
No rights of the defendants having attached by plea, decretal order, verdict, or otherwise, it would seem the court’s refusal to allow the plaintiffs to suffer a voluntary nonsuit is at variance with the practice established by a number of decisions. Oil Co. v. Shore, 171 N. C., 51, 87 S. E., 938; Olmsted v. Smith, 133 N. C., 584, 45 S. E., 953; Pass v. Pass, 109 N. C., 484, 13 S. E., 908; Bynum v. Powe, 97 N. C., 374, 2 S. E., 170; Graham v. Tate, 77 N. C., 120. In the absence of some right attaching which the defendant is entitled to have determined in the action, it is generally understood…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bynum v. . PoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Caldwell v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Carpenter, Baggott & Co. v. HanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- McKesson v. . MendenhallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- R. R. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Powell v. CrossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Southeastern Fire Insurance Company v. WaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Mitchell v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963