Legal Opinion
Stoto v. City of Waterbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 1934PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries suffered when he fell into an open areaway constructed and maintained in connection with a fire station of the defendant city, and from a judgment for the defendant has appealed. He seeks certain changes in the finding, but as made it sufficiently presents the issues of law. It states the following facts: The defendant owned a piece of land which was bounded upon the east by a passway sixteen feet wide, on the east side of which was a tract of land owned by Frank Santoro, in part occupied by certain tenements. Neither the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. Philadelphia & Havre De Grace Steam Towboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Hoffman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Flynn v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Capozzi v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Webel v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Beckwith v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Keeney v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- McPheters v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Brock-Hall Dairy Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.