Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Topliss

Appeal, No. 27, Jan. T., 1915, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1914, No. 5096, entered for plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, in case of Bethlehem Steel Company v. Charles W. Topliss and Frank H. Street, now or late trading as Topliss & Street. Assumpsit on hook account. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. The lower court made absolute plaintiff’s rule for. judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.. Defendant appealed. Error assigned, among others, was in making absolute, plaintiff’s rule for want…