Gold v. Fox Film Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Simpson,
Defendant appeals from an order of the court below, discharging its rule to strike off a confessed judgment for rent claimed to be due, which confession was alleged to have been entered by virtue of authority contained in a lease from plaintiffs to defendant. The decision below is right.
The lease specifies that it is “for the term of six years ......[and] that either party hereto may determine this lease at the end of said term by giving written notice thereof at least three months prior thereto, but in default of such notice, this lease shall continue, upon the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kennedy v. Rothrock Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. ToplissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Smith v. PringleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
3Cited by8 opinions
- Page v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- MacK v. FennellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Schetter v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Gold v. Fox Film Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Clair, to Use v. DohertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.