In re Glanzman
Indiana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This case is before us on an one count complaint for disciplinary action filed by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission. The complaint charges that the Respondent has violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(8), (4) and (6) of the Code of Professional Responsibility for Attorneys at Law by engaging in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude, conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation, and engaging in conduct which adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law. A Hearing Officer appointed pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 28 has heard evidence and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Caldwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of MoerleinIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of OlsenIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of DeloneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- In the Matter of BraultIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of ColemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1991