Matter of Deloney
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
This disciplinary matter is before us on a verified complaint charging the Respondent with three counts of misconduct arising out of the same incident. The Hearing Officer appointed pursuant to A.D. Rule 28, has submitted his findings and conclusions. Neither party has petitioned for review of the tendered findings. ~
There being no objection to the tendered findings, the Hearing Officer's report is now approved. In accordance with such report, we now find that the Respondent, a duly licensed attorney, in April, 1978, was retained by Laverne Davis and Willie Taylor to pursue…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of GormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- In the Matter of VincentIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- In Matter of EwersIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
4Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Contempt of the Supreme Court of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- In the Matter of BraultIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Matter of LevyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- In re GlanzmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- In re BryantIndiana Supreme Court · 1988