United States v. Frank Altobella and James Moxley
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Circuit Judge.
The squalid facts of this ease give rise to a serious question of federal jurisdiction. The record discloses a plain violation of the Illinois statute prohibiting extortion. 1 The issue for us to decide is whether defendants are also guilty of violating either the federal conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. § 371, or the federal statute enacted in 1961 “to prohibit travel or transportation in commerce in aid of racketeering enterprises,” 75 Stat. 498, 18 U.S.C. § 1952. Although the “Travel Act” can be read to cover this case, we have concluded that this prosecution is beyond…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Frankfort Distilleries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Federal Trade Commission v. Bunte Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. NardelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Bowen v. American Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Norman ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.