Legal Opinion

Kelly v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 7, 1969No. 4 Div. 24PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMON, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of appellant’s petition for writ of error coram nobis.

Appellant’s sole contention is that he was insane at the time of trial and sentence. After pleading not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity, a jury found him guilty of assault with intent to murder.

He insists the trial judge should have permitted him to have been examined by a commission on lunacy in accordance with Tit. 15, § 425, Code of Alabama, 1940. This contention is untenable for two reasons: (1) he was not charged with a capital offense, and (2) § 425, supra, is discretionary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Lamb v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. House v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  2. Thigpen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Billups v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  4. Braswell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API