Legal Opinion · Dissent

Headrick v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1999No. 1082-97Published

1Dissent

HOLLAND, J.,

filed a dissenting opinion in which PRICE, J., joined.

I dissent to the majority’s decision to vacate the judgment of the court of appeals. I do not agree with the majority that the State’s second ground for review is disposi-tive of this case. I believe the State’s question of whether “an application for a pre-trial writ of habeas corpus is the appropriate vehicle by which to raise a claim of collateral estoppel” is moot. Pursuant to our decision in State v. Brabson, 976 S.W.2d 182 (Tex.Crim.App.1998), appellant had no valid claim of collateral estoppel to raise in either a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BrabsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Neaves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Ex Parte Richards, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API