Legal Opinion
Fisser v. International Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 15, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMIERI, District Judge.
On January 18, 1957, libelants’ libel' was filed, seeking damages for breach of a contract of affreightment. The damages sought were $3,000,000 and» the libel was alleged to be brought by libel-ants “on their own behalf and on behalf and for the benefit of any other party or parties who are or may become interested therein, as their respective interests may ultimately appear.” Libel-ants now move for permission to file an amended libel, changing the prayer for damages to $1,214,100 and alleging that suit is brought “with the consent and authority of and on behalf and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fretz v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Ex Parte Indiana Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Lloyd Royal BelgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- National Interocean Corp. v. Emmons Coal Mining Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1921
- Cragin & Co. v. International S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fisser v. International BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Martran Steamship Co. v. Aegean Tankers LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Fisser v. International BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Carl Fisser and Martha Fisser, Co-Partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Fisser & v. Doornum, Libelants-Appellants v. International BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960