Legal Opinion

Carrigan v. Xerox Corp

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 18, 2022No. 3:21-cv-01085Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT CHRIS CARRIGAN, MICHAEL VENTI, ) SYLVAIN YELLE, individually and as ) 3:21-CV-1085 (SVN) representatives of a class of similarly ) situated persons, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) XEROX CORP., XEROX ) April 18, 2022 CORPORATION PLAN ) ADMINISTRATOR COMMITTEE, ) JOHN DOES 1-30, ) ) Defendants. ) RULING AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Sarala V. Nagala, United States District Judge. Three Plaintiffs, Chris Carrigan, Michael Venti, and Sylvain Yelle, bring this putative class action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. Ex Rel. Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers Retirement Plan v. Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. Sacerdote v. New York UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  5. Cohen v. S.A.C. Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API