Senise v. American Motor Club (In re American Motor Club, Inc.)
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON AMERICAN MOTOR CLUB’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
CONRAD B. DUBERSTEIN, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant American Motor Club’s (hereinafter “AMC” or “Defendant” or “Debtor”) motion to compel discovery of plaintiff John Senise (hereinafter “Senise”) and codefendant Marie Neu (hereinafter “Neu”).1 For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
*983FACTS
Defendant AMC, a New York corporation was in the business of selling automobile pre-paid collision service contracts to New York residents. A decision of the Supreme Court, State of New York, New York County, dated January…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Cymaticolor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lawrence Arms Associates v. Shur (In re Shur)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Sound Around, Inc. v. FriedmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025