Legal Opinion

Smith v. Young

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1963No. 232PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment entered upon a verdict of a jury finding that the plaintiff, appellee herein, is entitled to participate in the State Insurance Fund. Plaintiff’s husband was employed by Goodyear Atomic Corporation, a self-insurer, at its atomic energy plant in Pike County, as a maintenance mechanic from May 21, 1956, to January 27, 1957. He died from acute lymphatic leukemia on February 15,1957.

On January 27, 1959, the plaintiff filed a death claim for workmen’s compensation with the Industrial Commission in which she stated, inter alia, that his death…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kiriakis v. FountasOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Parletto v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zuljevic v. Midland-Ross Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Grant v. Ohio Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Reed v. MTD Products, Inc., Midwest IndustriesOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Williams v. Harsco Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API