Legal Opinion

J. R. Watkins Co. v. Fornea

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1924No. 24101PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSykes, P. J.

The appellant, a foreign corporation, as plaintiff, instituted this suit against Tom Rester as principal, and H. S. Stewart and W. J. Fornea as sureties, for the balance of an account due by Rester to appellant. The principal in the contract, Rester, made no defense. Stewart and Fornea among other things pleaded a material alteration in the contract made by Watkins without their knowledge and consent. The contract upon which this suit is based was attached to the declaration and reads as follows:

“This agreement, made at Winona, Minnesota, IT. S. A., this 1st day of December, A. D. 1919,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bank of Lauderdale v. ColeMississippi Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. J.R. Watkins Company v. KeeneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Martin v. HartleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  3. J. R. Watkins Co. v. PoagMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  4. J. R. Watkins Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. McConnon & Co. v. MenchMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API