Legal Opinion

McConnon & Co. v. Mench

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1926No. Docket No. 136PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Defendant Irving Mench had the right to sell extracts, medicines and other articles of merchandise, purchased of the Saginaw Medicine Company, within a specified territory. Desiring to continue such sales for another year, and being indebted to the Saginaw Medicine Company in the sum of $1,170.52, he received a contract prepared by the company and was required to obtain sureties. The contract so prepared by the company, as found by the jury, stated:

“The indebtedness dúe at the date of this agreement from the party of the second part to said company, for goods and other articles sold and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Manistee National Bank v. SeymourMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. J.R. Watkins Company v. KeeneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Willett v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Dr. Ward's Medical Co. v. WolleatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. J. R. Watkins Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. R.K.O. Radio Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  2. Greer v. ParksMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. J. R. Watkins Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API