Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Carroll

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided January 9, 1987No. ACM 25545Published

1DissentLewis, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Chief Judge Everett and Judge Cox, in their separate discussions in United States v. Johnson, have simply not altered the law to such an extent as to justify the result reached by the majority. I am not certain what the exact status of the law as to Donohew advisements is at this juncture, but I am reasonably certain that it is not what the majority relies on in finding a basis to affirm. In my view, reversal is required.

Johnson was written in a factual context much different from that in the case at hand. In Johnson, the military judge advised the accused that if he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SauerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. JacinthoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API