Legal Opinion

B

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1995No. ID 3251PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3251 Interim Decision #3251 In re B-, Applicant Decided May 19, 1995 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Under the circumstances of this case, where an asylum applicant’s testimony was plausible, detailed, internally consistent, consistent with the asylum application, and unembellished dur- ing the applicant’s repeated relating of events in a probing cross-examination, the Board declines to adopt the Immigration Judge’s adverse credibility finding. FOR APPLICANT: Cheryl L. Baratta, Esquire, Somerville, New Jersey…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
  4. MOGARRABIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1987
  5. CHENBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Jaime Ruiz v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. S-M-JBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
  3. KASINGABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
  4. S-PBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
  5. Sasetharan Arulampalam v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API