Legal Opinion

De Garmo v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1934No. L. A. 14503PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted in this case after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One. Upon further consideration, we are satisfied that the said court has correctly determined the issues, and we therefore adopt the opinion of Mr. Justice pro tempore Desmond, together with a part of the opinion of the court on petition for rehearing, as the opinion of this court. They read as follows:

“This is an application for a writ of mandate or such other writ as may be appropriate to secure cancellation of an order made by a judge of the Superior Court of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mohn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Trafficschoolonline, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Slater v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. De Garmo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API