Legal Opinion

Mid-Valley Distilling Corp. v. De Carlo

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 29, 1947No. 9232PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

On and prior to May 29, 1945 the petitioner, Mid-Valley Distilling Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, held certain basic permits authorizing it to engage in the distilling, warehousing, rectifying, wholesaling and importing of liquors. On that day all of Mid-Valley’s outstanding capital stock was acquired by Distillers Factors Corporation. Notice of this transfer was given by Mid-Valley to the Supervisor, Alcohol Tax Unit, District No. 3, and within 30 days applications for new basic permits were filed by Mid-Valley with the Alcohol Tax Unit which acknowledged their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Feitler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  3. Trenton Beverage Co. v. BerkshireCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  4. Billik v. BerkshireCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  5. Thomas J. Molloy & Co. v. BerkshireCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Distributing Company, Inc. v. United States Treasury Department, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Marine Wholesale & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. United Distillers Products Corp. v. HenneberryDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
  4. United Distillers Products Corporation v. H. L. Henneberry, Assistant Regional CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  5. National Distributing Co. v. United States Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API