Brannigan v. City of New York

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J.), entered on or about July 9, 1994, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars, and denied the defendant’s cross-motion to preclude the plaintiffs from proving at trial those items for which particulars had not been provided, is unanimously reversed, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the plaintiffs are directed to respond to defendant’s bill of particulars, numbers 7 and 8.

It is…