Legal Opinion

State v. Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1970PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order entered December 19, 1969 modified on the law and facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to the appellant, to the extent of striking items 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, *77010, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21, and as so modified, affirmed. The complaint in the instant ease spells out the particular charges against defendants under the Donnelly Act (General Business Law, § 340) by identifying the type and nature of the anti-competitive restraint as a boycott plus the overt acts. No further particulars are required to apprise defendants of the cause of action. The purpose of a bill of particulars…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. Northway Eng'g v. FELIX INDUSNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Rosario v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Patterson v. Jewish Hospital & Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Randall v. PechAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Bassett v. Bando Sangsa Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API